Great blog post on The Economist website today about Brazil’s planned $17 billion bullet train.
Brazil has been talking about this for years but plans have yet to get off the drawing board. No one wants to take on the challenge because they don’t think it’s an economically viable project.
The Economist piece takes a while to get to the point, which is this. And I quote:
“Most of Brazil’s roads are unpaved. Some important routes—including some interstate highways—are single-lane and extremely dangerous. Half the population is not connected to the sewage system. There are few (ordinary) commuter or freight rail lines, and they are mostly in very poor condition. Urban mass transport is grossly deficient: São Paulo, a metropolis of nearly 20m souls, has a mere 71km (44 miles) of metro, plus a few overland urban rail lines, which at peak hours are all terrifyingly overcrowded. It is so easy to think of a long list of more worthwhile infrastructure projects in Brazil that it is hard to understand why this one is not dismissed out of hand.”
I’d put it more succinctly:
The plan to spend at least 34 billion reais (and probably much more) on the bullet train is a classic example of Brazil’s delusions of grandeur. Brazil has hardly any rail system and yet wants to build a high speed train link. It has hardly any submarines and yet plans to build a nuclear sub. It has just published plans for its 4G network when its 3G doesn’t work properly.
Brazil should be concentrating on walking before it can run. It has taken laudable steps to reduce inequality but there is so much more to be done to make life liveable for the poorest sectors of society and those should take precedence over Pharaonic projects like a bullet train.
Why is it doing this? Who knows. It wants to be first world. It wants to show off. It wants to show it can. It’s not because it needs it.
So why do it? Not for consumers or passengers. As The Economist suggests, the number of passengers is likely to be half the government’s estimate and prices are likely to be double.
Who benefits? That one’s easier to answer. The same corrupt kleptocrats in the political class and their bosom buddies who run the construction companies.

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 26, 2012 at 6:13 am
jlemien
Andrew, do you have some other examples of Brazil spending on impressive and expensive projects in place of more practical projects? I’m fairly new to Brazil as a subject as I’d like to beef up a little on my background.
August 26, 2012 at 12:27 pm
andrewdownie
Joseph,
The three I’ve mentioned are good ones. Add to that the huge investment in white elephant stadiums for the World Cup. For example, they’re building a 45,000 seat stadium (or thereabouts, I can’t be bothered to check exactly) in Manaus, where the local football team gets crowds of 1000.
Major dam projects are also questionable, when a much cheaper alternative would be to invest in energy efficiency. There’s many more, try this great blog for more: http://www.geostadia.com/
Or maybe someone else can comment….
However, I’d say that
August 26, 2012 at 4:13 pm
jlemien
Thanks for the info!
August 26, 2012 at 4:11 pm
jon
Brazlians have described Salvador’s metro system to me as perhaps the worst, most inefficient public works project in human history.
August 27, 2012 at 2:58 pm
Fred
be careful that you don.t ruffle too may feathers